International enforcement of cryptocurrency laws: Jurisdictional challenges and collaborative solutions

Ngozi Samuel Uzougbo 1, *, Chinonso Gladys Ikegwu 2 and Adefolake Olachi Adewusi 3

1 The Ohio State University, USA.
2 Independent Researcher, New York, USA.
3 Independent Researcher, Ohio, USA.
 
Review Article
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 11(01), 068–083​
Article DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2024.11.1.0075
Publication history: 
Received on 28 March 2024; revised on 07 May 2024; accepted on 10 May 2024
 
Abstract: 
The rise of cryptocurrencies has presented new challenges for regulators around the world, particularly in terms of enforcement across international borders. This abstract explores the jurisdictional challenges faced by authorities in enforcing cryptocurrency laws and proposes collaborative solutions to address these challenges. Cryptocurrencies operate on a decentralized network, making them difficult to regulate within traditional legal frameworks. Jurisdictional issues arise when a cryptocurrency transaction involves parties in different countries, as it is often unclear which jurisdiction's laws apply. This ambiguity can lead to regulatory gaps and enforcement challenges, allowing illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing to flourish. To address these challenges, collaborative solutions are needed. International cooperation between regulators, law enforcement agencies, and industry stakeholders is essential to ensure effective enforcement of cryptocurrency laws. This cooperation can take various forms, including information sharing, joint investigations, and the development of common regulatory standards. One example of successful collaboration is the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental organization that sets standards for combating money laundering and terrorism financing. The FATF's guidance on virtual assets and virtual asset service providers has helped to clarify regulatory expectations and promote consistency in enforcement efforts across jurisdictions. Another example is the Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement (J5), a coalition of tax authorities from five countries that work together to combat international tax evasion. The J5's focus on cryptocurrency-related tax crimes highlights the importance of cross-border cooperation in tackling cryptocurrency-related illicit activities. In conclusion, while jurisdictional challenges remain a significant hurdle in the enforcement of cryptocurrency laws, collaborative solutions offer a path forward. By working together, regulators, law enforcement agencies, and industry stakeholders can address these challenges and ensure that the benefits of cryptocurrencies are realized while mitigating their risks.
 
Keywords: 
Solutions; Jurisdictional; Cryptocurrency Laws; Collaborative; International Enforcement
 
Full text article in PDF: